The article then expands on the ruling’s implications in higher education, K-12 education, private colleges and universities, and the hiring of faculty and teachers. The third standard of review, which is the most rigorous, is strict scrutiny. In United States constitutional law, a suspect classification is a class or group of persons meeting a series of criteria suggesting they are likely the subject of discrimination. We further analyze the case under the strict scrutiny judicial review standard and explore how social science could play a role in determining the outcome. University of Texas at Austin case and ruling. The Supreme Court ruled that deference to the University under the narrow tailoring prong does not follow the standard of strict scrutiny.Īfter briefly explaining the equal protection analysis and earlier Supreme Court decisions involving race-conscious admissions, we provide a background on the Fisher v. Affirming the district court’s opinion, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held in favor of the University presuming that the University’s decision to use race was made in good faith. In Fisher, Abigail Fisher, a Caucasian Texas resident, claimed that the University of Texas at Austin denied her admission because of her race and that other minority students with fewer qualifications were admitted instead of her. The other two standards are intermediate scrutiny and rational basis review. However, the Court remanded the case back to the Fifth Circuit because it did not properly review the University’s admissions plan to determine whether it was narrowly tailored. The meaning of STRICT SCRUTINY is the highest level of judicial scrutiny that is applied especially to a law that allegedly violates equal protection in. Strict scrutiny is the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. The Supreme Court has articulated three theoretically different standards of review for determining whether government action has denied any person equal. Instead, the Supreme Court affirmed that diversity is a compelling state interest and race-conscious admissions are permissible under a strict scrutiny review. Bollinger, some expected the Court to overrule the use of race in deciding admissions into colleges and universities. Because it has been less than ten years since the Supreme Court ruled on Grutter v. University of Texas at Austin, the latest higher education case involving race-conscious admissions. The Washington Post - By Letters to the Editor 2h. ![]() This standard, strict scrutiny, is known colloquially among lawyers as strict in theory, fatal in fact. Supreme Court, many were in suspense over how the Court would rule on Fisher v. Strict scrutiny standards and the UNC case. Describing the right to terminate a pregnancy as akin to a fundamental right, the Court determined that challenged abortion laws must be analyzed under the highest level of judicial review.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |